Libertarienii or classical Liberals, of all researchers in the social sciences that i've met, I'm probably the most adept to describe liberalism, or the order of liberty, i.e. mechanisms put in motion, freedom and their advantages compared to alternative mechanisms. It would not be hard to write the Constitution or rules of fundamental freedom. but the challenge they faced now is different from the one that had her parents to the United States Constitution. She is not thinking of the final status of the Constitution, but to imagine the tranzitionare mechanisms that State of which we are still far away. The challenge is to imagine rules that to order the transition towards freedom: to imagine a Constitution without the unpredictable effects of liberalization.
This ingenious "bill rates" adopted one of the transition States of Eastern Europe starting with Hungary, has the potential to rank the transition towards freedom. If we want to think bold, and the transition to be done fast enough, then proposing a Constitution Law Liberalization on line rates. It allows citizens to redirect a portion of what he was going to the State anyway, to one or several CSOs freely chosen by the taxpayer. The new law 571/2003 allows for the redirection of two per cent of income tax organizations that provide public services and thus taken from the tasks of the State. The novelty of this Act is to be subjected to a fraction of the exposed area of the public services the competition mechanism. Obviously small enough fraction that virtually not budge the monopoly State agencies and have positive effects too. but it is the promise of a world in which the systems of public administration services, infrastructure, insurance, education, culture, health, courts, police, to be gradually open choice and responsibility of the individual tax payer.
Economic science what does it look promising. First, eliminate the problem of Chronicle competition ineficientei. Under the pressure of competition for resources allocated to the free market, providers of public services have the incentive to evolve rapidly according to consumer dorintelelor. Secondly, direct financing to suppliers by the contributors remove the problem of budgetary funds especially the insertions. Those who work in an NGO, deprived of shelter, monopoly know that suspicion would be sponsors fatal. Thirdly, direct financing, without the mediation of public policy and admnistratiei, dynamite problem political clientele. Also, the machine production of special laws and regulations designed to encourage a client or another would be fueled increasingly less. Fourth, pressure groups, fear democracy theorists would become irrelevant. What more could you together? It would take to convince independently a few millions of taxpayers and not others like li deserves more public resources.
Promise but cannot Fulfill in the frames of the current Constitution, because her answers to the questions that form the game rules of the individual and the State, make it impossible to change. It must be established again) who decides the level of taxation, b) who decides which are the areas ' public ' that benefit from tax money, c) who decides how much money go to one of these areas instead of going at each other and d) inside a public domain, who decides which particular vendor, company or organization, gets money for its project proposal. Law rates pave a new response to the last three questions: increasingly less political and administrative apparatus and increasingly more, taxpayers directly.
Constitution Law line transition rates would accomplish exactly what we want from the EU Constitution: to provide rules that change the sort order. She could control the pace of growth of freedom for example raising the transfer decision from the State towards individuals with a percentage per annum. Each fiscal year, according to the Constitution, would convert a percentage of arbitrary power of the State, in responsibility and freedom of choice for each of the individual taxpayers. Gradually, the power of the State was dangerous would dissolve without public services have suffered. Because such a mechanism of change to function predictably though, he has helped the constitutional limitations on the power of the State to increase the level of taxation or to invent new ways of charging and taxation, besides the patented inventions, VAT, excise, inflation or budget deficit. Ideally, all taxes should be aggregated Together and subject to the law of percentages. Otherwise, the percentages would sink under the weight of the State, as so many other good ideas, or if not, will remain at the level it is now, "big step for humanity and small step for man".