The main problem of education (mandatory, especially; however, many apply to other segments)-as the title suggests-gravitate around the question: who must decide, in the last instance, if, what, how, who, under the guidance of nail etc. should I study children? The answer today is very clear: the State. If any parent feels wronged by what I say, I invite you to make changes in syllabuses of subjects children studying at school, or even withdraw the child from the public system to educate him (solely) on their own. If in the first case there will only be a true kämp izbeasca of decision-maker (the State, through the Ministry of education-resort), try it at the most influence, the second might very well get led prison did or to lose children to parental negligence.
Ubicuu system of meditations doesn't look than that-in-can use de facto parents fix the damage caused by the public system. (Or, worse, that they are forced to move kids through the caudine forks of examinations imposed by decree or required to lawfully access to higher levels of payroll or monopoly privilege branse, gender lawyers, notaries, officers of the civil status etc.).
behind the just indignation of the people well (just a guess) that I would be able to respond harshly as children and forget about poor people, without possibilities and chances, I think is hiding a trust misunderstood (at least to me) good intentions and the full competence of public authorities. I could call this vision the angelic State and infallible ". Or statolatrie. The same people who, when they act in private, are considered not sufficiently responsible and competent to solve problems their offspring to educate (and possibly others) become magically-by simply passing in the service of State-Mary omniscient and mighty ones. And what indigneaza me (me this time) the best is like the difference between the two specific cases there seems to be other than being able to use (without consequences that one uses). Therefore, in vain you are parent (maybe you're denatured); in vain you are private entrepreneur education (like hraparet or maybe you're not thinking than to the wealthy that afford more expensive education); in vain you are private company quality certification of education (as you may be partial, coruptibila, "mituibila"); nothing you're private teacher (as can teach nonsense, uninterested than fee); But if you're the Minister of Education, inspector or do other positions of these "public" (State) "all reliable you can voiesti them how many"-you and the good Lord.
One thing I find strange is that whenever I ask someone how has started a public education exercise, see a priori history through which quizzed driven by good intentions,, imagines what would be the reasons why he would call such a solution, then darken the arguments equal opportunities gender, literacy, etc. A foray into historical true but would quickly dezvraji the myth: public education was originally cam everywhere (Prussia, France, USA, England or even Romania) a programme for the creation of "citizens". I mean loyal State, tax payers, received martyrdom for leaders in the armed forces, used, etc. I'm often like a crazy wench decent through Romania, which they say wants public education was a conscientious objectors of the task (which is not endowed, view Ladies!) to educate kids, i'd show off outside with a broom from the House on Dewey or a Horace Mann in the early moments when you'd hear CHHE progresistele protestant ideas about how you should educate your children to the pile.
What to do? I think the only ones that can reasonably be presumed that they are authentically interested in children are good parents. Therefore, their need to be repaid in full and full sovereignty (if you will) in terms of education. No Parliament, no Ministry, no comitii or various committees and various inspectors. And it is the same with freedom of enterprise in education (private schools, entrepreneurs, professors and private competitors in quality certifiers). For the poor-schools of charitable or humanitarian foundations (private), of monasteries or churches.
I feel tension in the nape of the pragmatic leaders gradualisti who wonder what can be done "here and now" in order to improve the quality of education. Just as you desfiintam Ministry of education tomorrow! Parafrazandu it on William Lloyd Garrison, the sagacious opponent of slavery in America in the 19th century, does not say that it will disband tomorrow-but that should go away even today, say. Until one another strategic goal-preserving authentic education privatization in mind, there are always more small steps that can be taken. For instance, the freedom to educate young people (homeschooling, say the Anglo-Saxons), obviously with the corresponding tax relief (do not use the public system, why not give tax part). The most important element of any strategy of reform of education remain but of genuine alternatives outside the public system. Nothing like free to give private schools, but they find out to be certified at a public body. More subtly, but all public education e.
