Extinct myths
At the end of the 90s, I've asked Eder history why nobody pronounced the word "capitalism" on television. "Who will have the courage to be associated with the exploitation of man by man, the image of the subject in the recent totalitarian lab? And who else than praise representative democracy, atotmantuitor Elixir? "I replied.
We now know that reprezentatativa democracy still remains able to observe millions of individuals thinking of him growing up in a cocoon of rules which, like children, or fail to do, or do not understand them, or do they are helpful. And in terms of operation, we now know that, in terms of competition, patron-employee relationship is not one vertical of power, but is a mere relationship-work against the currency. Essential conditions of free competition are: only the fear that the employee will leave the employer to another employer more gracious makes himself, just as the employee's employer just afraid that will find a more diligent employee makes himself hard.
Official myths
And yet, the old horse rapciugos of capitalism, although quick as the wind, it's still kept the bottom of things. ask who makes sure the relationship between employee and employer, many would be proud with his horses, but empty on the inside, you State: "social democracy", "Union" or "the Office X for the smooth running of Things." Why? Because I live and breathe the myths of today, as in the past they breathed in from the past. In the late 1990s public figures taking advantage from maintaining the myth of his employer-Scarecrow and sneaky and swollen from feeding the bright representative of the democracy myth. As of today, they have gained from maintaining the myth of "scary" wild capitalism, "and in" anarchy from feeding the axiom sacrosante must share in the leaders and the led.
There is a current in anthropology, economics, political and social philosophy according to which axiom it's fake and that splitting into leaders and led, or dangerous, or irrelevance to the social order. What then explains the order? Amazing or not, it's just pulled the heavy horse at rapciugos. Capitalism, or synonym lucky "free market", has two essential components: 1) private property over capital (means of production) and 2) competition, i.e. free admission to any contractor in any sector of the production of goods and services. A few moments of reflection shows that it's not anarcho-capitalism something other than the most "pure" capitalism: private property plus competition in all areas. Anarcho-capitalism is the order in which all sectors of economic activity, not just health, roads, education, but also including the production of money, security and justice are demonopolizate. In other words, voluntary transactions bidder-buyer replace vertical relationship in all fields and asymmetrical power between State and individual, leader and led.
How anarchy produces orders
Who makes law? the question is the product of the most powerful myth behind fear of anarcho-capitalism: the idea that we need to put in a unique position as a master who produce the order and apply it by force. I'd repay another question: who is doing it today? If "law" I understand the rules that produce social order, not bushy and meaningless regulations, then Parliament makes it through his work, but ordinary individuals through their practices. Who apply today? every night simpatizam with a film that makes its self-righteous in spite of any official organizations or corrupt, or has no time, or has no relevant information. We understand that sometimes, in fact, "the scope of justice centres" are fortunately very distributed workforce, and the monopoly held by the master e-stat only on paper, not in reality. It's not here just about firms and private detectives and bodyguards about Vienna Awards private companies often prefer State courts greoaielor; but a more comprehensive and dynamic exchanges and relationships from which all agents in society. Fear of arguing against a parent, a friend or a stranger tricked or wronged creates the necessary balance of forces along the order and we adjust each of the behaviors after all. Political power is a small part of this network. In fact, if we look up, harming the relations between States are Bill anarhica: there is no supra-conductor, and yet, we can speak of a balance or an agenda. Relationships of Exchange and negotiation with "valuable information" creates the same kind of anarchic equilibrium within the caste "leaders".
The release of the leaders of the myth
The fear of anarchy will disappear when we realize that, in a sense, we are already in it. There is not and should not build key positions that we produce. What makes all of us behave towards us after a single uniform law-today and in pure anarcho-capitalist model-is not uniqueness of laws, but the fact that multiple sources, each individual separately, instinctively react the same. (ii) those who punish us take the liberty or property and encourage in one way or another those who we respect them. Following examples taken from others, it creates a typology of reactions, punishments and rewards. The law is not just the sum of these typologies, the electrical analogs of certain violations and certain punishment. We produce all continually. That's why I think that essentially the way to anarcho-capitalism is not that an institutional revolution, a revolution of social rules, how one's mental, a release from the myth of carmacilor.