Last year, the Supreme Court of Justice made a decision against the restriction imposed by the authority in the District of Columbia regarding the possession of fire arms. Beyond the American constitutional dispute (see R. Posner In Defense of Looseness) what are the arguments for getting a licence to hold fire arms? Is there any relevant difference between the American background and the Romanian one?
Bogdan Glavan presents
To read: Bogdan Glavan – Legalizing Fire Arms
Optional: Listen to two radio shows cu Tom Palmer, Cato Institute, one of whom sued and won the case against DC.
March 14, 2008 (18:01)
Tom Palmer talks about the DC gun ban on Reporter’s Roundtable
March 12, 2008 (31:46)
Tom G. Palmer talks to the Washington Post about the DC gun ban.

