In the spring of 2007, when projecting from the Center for analysis and institutional development annual meeting European think tank pro-freedom, we chose together with project partners at the Institute for Economic Studies, France, Hayek Institute, Austria, Atlas Foundation, the Cato Institute and the Heritage, United States constitutional change as the theme of the Conference. It's very difficult to impose a theme on the agenda. When the ' immediate ' threats on the part of political actors in public functions are so numerous, nor we can expect media to not respond continuously to them. It's explicable that can't handle a few days with a proposal as well as the start-up of a constitutional process, which announces to lie on for several years and involved in dialogue agents too "normal" to arouse the journalistic interest. Constitutional topic came to the attention of the public with policy crisis since 2007. In June, July and October of 2007 when we organised a series of debates on the theme of a rewrite of the Constitution of Romania in Bucharest, Craiova, Arad and Timisoara, the opportunity has been used by political parties ' representatives to launch their own institutional reconstruction projects. The debate was opened.
A group of exponents of classical-liberal current in Romania together with 22 Magazine had a regular publishing activities product initiative in 2008 to deal with the problems from the perspective of ideology of public liberty. This collection focuses on the analysis of the constitutional document, the source of so many worries in a radical manner and at the same time fundationala.
Frames contemporary debate demand that libertarienilor to us concerns fundamental rules to take the State as he is right now working material. To imagine State institution as an ensemble consisting of two giant converters. A converter called "political system" designed to liquefy cetenilor preferences in political decisions and other converter named "public system" which solidify political decisions in public and regulatory actions or interventions. What is the size of the ensemble? His exact size takes into account the last lion spent the most insignificant activity of the two converters and the last lion spent due to the provisions of the last non-significant legal or administrative regulations. Only public sector activities has increased in 2007 with 3.6% of GDP (32,2% of GDP In 2006 and 36.4% In 2007), although it can grow with 12,4%, the total required public institutions for 2007 of 45.2% of GDP. This phenomenon takes place on an annual basis; for 2008, the draft budget provides for expenditure of 42% of GDP, i.e. an increase of 5.6%. If you prefer European arguments ' ' Juergen Starck, Vice President of the European Central Bank recommended that the public sector does not exceed 30% of GDP, i.e. the structure of the market and the economy collapses is in danger.
With higher public sector budget, the more resources go into the political game who share common resources. Redistributia is from those who work but cannot avoid to pay taxes, to those good enough to the political game to seize them. And they are the best the pace of growth of the State in terms of responsibilities, laws, regulations, grows more astonishing, because it can hide in a Cristian hatis reglementativ confused. Strictly quantitative growth on the control arogarilor on the trading market and the lives of the citizens was enacted in 2006 7.552 respectively with new laws In 2007 4.816. It is of course impossible to correct and uniform application of the cca. 70.361 laws, are in total in the repertoire. Systemic effects are generalized confusion, loss of respect for law and ultimately individuals ' Bill face adversity. From this time the Assembly is structurally affected and rupture of the preferences of individuals and public service passes the threshold upto which cannot be repaired. Recompun girl studies in a converters parts architecture teacher.
