After communism, tac, anarchic societies. As it was, their ability to make his way in his own interest, to organize and support, it's poor. Nobody is guilty because everyone seems to look outside the establishment of the new stories. From this point of view, modern forms of authoritarian who crossed the Eastern European States, including Romania, and EU accession process looks like. They share the same lack of popular participation. Much celebrated European integration will certainly bring many great earnings. The collective conscious option exercise is not among them. Where, once, to United for the meteorite, there's a Communist form of discernment, an intelligence group policy, there is now a cluttered than some boot pulsatia not a language. Hence, surprises, tartori figures and extremists, the lack of large classes and layers, leading to solid ratios, to order and to good governance. Creative methods of engines and produce a wrongheaded bourgeoisie, incalecata tyrannical oligarchs picturesque and perfect always tembeli from politically. Romania is not an exception, but her case it's exasperating. After Castillo, V, then V, Voiculescu, Becali in their trail and above all a constant sum game void. In 17 years of anecdotica tragi-comical, Romanian political system did not come out from large data never prescribed immediately after 1989: a square dominated legislative and parliamentary left and crossed by incursions of a straight running disaggregated. The famous wreck of the Democratic Convention is, in fact, along with the miners, the best definition of constants: conceptual political weakness and strength of the anarchic format. In other words, we do not protrude, but administrative creation fails devalmasia.
Social history of long-standing treason against
The basic policy framework of Postcommunist Romania e glandular, masificat and preconceptual. From here, the fabric, nearly formula transistorica that results from NSF to PSD, over violentul, scindari, scandals and his greed tarigradeana of N. People at rallies in 1990 there were rispit. Remained but the consequences of radioactive waste, which maintain a constant toxicity. The steppe has not gained relief. The change brought by the new era of oligarchs not only customizing the old report. It signals the absence of ideas and collective forces really us. Generations of new social realities of communism not purged the memory of having nothing to say and propose, besides crockery and obositoarei their confessions and historical amnesia. Substantial and energetic novelty that these generations were to print public life, thus risking to be one and the same with the refusal of participation with escapismul hedonist. We remain, therefore, in the company of political scenery has known: a territory dominated by commitments and masificarea stangista, a neideologic of socialism, modernized the appearance of pigmented media wars and inexhaustible art of intrigue, as pluralism. Missing, almost entirely, the construction of coherent, long term reliability, and size. Suffer, I mean, a Twitter that says a lot about a certain kind of individualism devoid of freedom and full of dread, mistrust immediate remarks delivered in the common commitments, with strangers, neighbors, colleagues, friends, relatives or other embodiments of criminal suspects nearby. In large part this infirmity, this lack of vision suprapersonala comes from an underdeveloped well installed. Exorbitant amount of wealth visible political leaders, parliamentarians and the unhappy media stars deceiving: under the first layer it hides a poverty of means and barbara, a brutality that Romanian world was accustomed to as a capability. From here, a structural illiteracy that does not know and do not believe that there is a need for language that has ruined the education that you desfide. Miliardarii have not made or factory school diplomas after patent V-Voiculescu, doctors in something else, respectively. The mix of ideas and argument written or spoken, doesn't matter. Battles big or small disputes resolve themselves through an interlocking system of siretenii and shady instincts. Cripple human individualism social novel involves dissociation or panda. Both lead to the most prevalent form of inconsistency of policy: the betrayal of the party. This is why this type of infidelity has been dogged in his comedies Caragiale and, for this reason, many people assumed that it's a reflex, a historical vestige. Scizionismul of parties and clan feuds, ruptures and reconciliation scarce Bagchi, oligarhici and even pushy suspect who spoke at the last Congress of the liberal "treason", say something else.
Left home
Division and schism, flee towards the general practice of fidelity of selfishness, the refusal of the duration, the famous Romanian clutter are symptoms of neurosis, not historical accidents. Something, a disbelief in the consistency of time and a dread of Association social territory without dominating the Romanian opponent. No one was used to or has not verified the advantages of construction possible. Inavutirea and personal fulfillment are a quick question or not at all. Why? We're poor, what's not irreparable, but we and them endlessly, I mean we live in a social life completely ruined, what's almost irreparable. Poverty explains the thirst for parvenire. Dirt cycle dictates social relations but relentlessly initiative of pipernicirea life and fixismul the political scenery collectives. Under these conditions, describing more than a front without direction and objectives, so-called generic left, either in the form of communism, either as a social-democrat, feels at home. It doesn't have to make efforts, but the doctrinal, simply, to be the face. The rest comes by itself: the lack of resources of society in General, of vast territories of small towns and forgotten, from rural maidanul organized after the rules for which no satrapy have changed much in Romanian history. The left dominates political life without being or ever having been an ideology, only propulsata and social underdevelopment. Because, in a way almost unthinkable, Romanian social life has always been an deficiency with the left, meaning he always followed the anarchic impulses, refused the construction of exquisite corruption and supplied him with that model those Trophy winners bombastici and call on primitive, indeobste, bogatani, billionaires, oligarchs. Right, I mean bending toward the order without servitude, never had and never has, in its variant, popular roots. It is not a compound. Social value missing right precisely because it could not be initiated, fragmented and untouched by the values of homogenization and emancipation which they have imposed elsewhere, social Catholicism, namely imburghezirea nonurbane environments. What we had and what we could have, really, should be looked at with realism. Under the terms of a society without good access to imburghezirii mechanisms, which we developed in the area of German Catholics and Protestants in the immediate vicinity of our Romanian, was right, and it will be again, a movement intellectual elite breeds. Direction and a work programme, as its founders understood, junimistii.
Three exceptions, a laboratory and a guide
It's possible the reconstruction of this formula, in Romania in 2007? Yes, and we already have the first signs. But the process must be well understood in all his details. This means, first, that the new construction of the righteous, which can absorb filoanele libertarian, liberal, conservative, you have to accept the reality of social realism with an underdeveloped State. It can't be more than a movement of elite breeds and intellectual policy conception. What's not little. Secondly, in order to overcome the ideological status of the laboratory, the right must put on the reconstructed problem relationships. She will need a guide, an intermediary known and accepted in society. Only with such an Alliance would give up intermediate chance to change things in real terms and to make his ideas a concrete political actions. Who's this ally-guide-mediator? The answer is easier to understand if we accept the following analysis-summary of ideas-the person who dominated Romania last 17 years: from left, monolithic and dominant, the constellation, Iliescu. outside this archipelago, the history of the Romanian policy has, over the past 17 years, only three exceptions. First came out from life and from the game: Corneliu Coposu, figure who wore the heroic mode, without outputting the germs can more than to maintain visibility. The other two figures outside of left Isles are gregarious Valeriu Stoica and Traian Basescu.
New Alliance
Sahin has a proven track record and a potential still little understood. He managed to be practically the only top politician able to articulate and to follow a consistent ideology. Classical liberalism and his mobile Stoica gave consistent LIBERALS and rescued the party from inactualitate. The moment in which the LIBERALS gave way, as a political device, the old social rules subordonarii to (in this case, to offer his salary of Patricius), the connection was broken. Sahin could no longer make political projects aboard a party annihilated intellectually and converted to parvenitism. Attempt of modernization led by Stoica was hit at the party, a social custom and it appeared the need for another vehicle: the Liberal Democratic Party. Important is that, after the appearance of this initiative, the Centre Party animated by Stoica remains in Office. He can combine ideas from different areas, forcing the intellectual and political, finally, coagulation of a body of ideas, of a "platform" compatible with European political modernity. But this product par excellence intellectual and political, must become a reality. The transition from concept to action cannot be provided than the proximity of PD, that is territory of Basescu. For the second large exception to the rule of Romania's post-communist policy e devalmase, a nonideologica personality, through which social reality is their Romanian threads. The secret of success Basescu exactly easy recognizable appearance of personalities of Romanian society statistics table. With Basescu, a large electorate reflected the language and the type of relationships that were modest, but clean objective of majority for post-Communist era: populism. This does not break the habits of communism, with incendiary but uses them to create new reports. Pushy Basescu over the legality and the role of the State is understood and accepted by everyone, so that doesn't suggest a foreign territory and risky, but, on the contrary, promise in terms of safety. Positive populism opened in Romanian politics Tsang s current right on a rebuilt must support. He runs inside, where the majority of social and political ideas high vocabulary does not have access or are viewed with reserve. If, on the contrary, counting on rapid urbanization and the emergence of a new elite city, risking a right rude awakening. Because these new beds will definitely occur, stimulated by the rise of multinationals, the banking sector and the bureaucratic demands of staff. but these minipopulatii we will go on stage without a substantial ideological conductor. They'll be opportunistic and materialistic through excellence at the superficial level. They have all chances to confine its focus or consumerism and to fail in the current minor (environmentalism, exoticism, sic, lozincard PC militancy tolerance). Right will find no echo reconstructed in these environments. She has everything to gain from the vicinity of populismului's social realism Basescu. At the same time, she will have to observe a distance to her new ally, so as not to risk absorption or conceptual discoloration. But first, it needs accumulation: a collection of themes and bearers of ideas which can give the doctrinal weight.