Announce with pleasure the appearance in bookstores of the justice Elements of David Schmidtz, a book written in the Western tradition of philosophy politics started with Rawls and Nozick in the 70s. Roman readers interested in the manner in which philosophy politics in the West also provide State and Anarchy, utopia of Robert Nozick, translated for Humanitas, a theory of justice by John Rawls, translated this spring for the Publishing House of the University "Alexandru Ioan Cuza", and now have the book of Schmidtz.
Elements of dreptatiia David Schmidtz, translated by Tudor Galley and Ike Divya for collection of Humanitas Freedom Culture as part of a project CADI-Konrad Adenauer Stiftung fostaleasa in 2009, the Atlas Economic Research Foundation, hub and catalyst of the institutes in the world, pro market among the best ten books pro freedom of the Decade.
David Schmidtz and colleagues at the University of Arizona are the developers of a program of philosophy politics occupying today 1st position in the Philosophical Gourmet rankings, the best known of the profession. Schmidtz has published in journals such as valued Ethics, Journal of Philosophy, or Political Theory at Cambridge and publishing, Oxford, Wiley and Blackwell. His moral philosophy interests-the relationship with the natural environment, with peers, and with himself-are combined with economic analysis.
Elements of modern liberals turn dreptatiicritica from classical liberalism towards social democracy and take apart the two core ideas of social liberalism. First, put the question Justice concept as a distribution and argues in favor of a modern concepts of righteousness, seen as a set of procedures. Secondly, instead of his proposal of righteousness as Rawls ideal situation that we are trying to foresee, collectively, pleads for a common book in which many elements are to be treated as a fundamental moral: merit, reciprocity, equality and need.
Schmidtz build a philosophy libertariana policy by specifying the relationship between these elements and the production of wealth. The author tries to rid us of yshape wealth present obsession and prompts us to ask how we can arrange our institutions for the purpose of production of wealth. What creates wealth rules, such as individual ownership over its inzestrari, free enterprise, and free exchange.

