* Originally Published in revista 22 collection ' Fuzionismul: an experiment in doctrinaire of modern discourse '.
It celebrates half century since fuzionista-movement Alliance of right-wing religious conservative, and pro-Western and classical liberalism values representing libertarienii manages to address American intellectual and political right. The merger is still maintained today in the United States at all levels: the teoretizarii of political doctrines, Coalition, and cooperation in the world. Intellectual platform started Frank Meyer in the pages of National Review in the ' 60s we illustrate how an intellectual success, an idea of the two doctrines, holds and maintains an Alliance policy designed to protect individuals from any interference of the State. Let's look at the american experiment as a model to be followed literally but as a source of inspiration.
The following articles have in common the idea that there is a large intersection between conservative and libertarian values that make possible the functioning of political alliance and other companies than the u.s. one. Even if there are differences with respect to the legitimate State and stretching the law, common values are found at least liberty and individual responsibility together with the idea that the State should not be climbed on a pedestal, many public functions can be accomplished better by the market and civil society mechanisms.
Frank Meyer his project as a continuance of conservatism. And he is an advocate of life with her virtuous determinatiile. The moral and metaphysical painting, conservatives are right-freedom is a simple means for the goals of the individual and those transcendent libertarian who works with a value theory according to which there is no other moral judge of personal domain of life beyond the preference of the individual, is cheating. But at the level of political institutions, and here stand a key argument Meyer, this vision let freedom a space as big as the one you claim libertarienii. All projects-both legal ingerintele intrusive State in economics as well as in personal life-must be rejected because in the absence of genuine freedom of choice between Vice and virtue, virtuoasa life may be authentic, but not mimata lived. Policy authority must be gradually to limit the role of maintaining firmly of the autonomy of the person. Beyond that, the Administration must be excluded or moral virtuous behaviours by force of law.
"Virtue" is a broad concept. And I'm wary of debt to take interstitiile in others, institutional damage and the obligation to assist those who are in difficulty, and matters related to personal ethics, such as drug use or sexual freedom related to what conservatives call "virtue". The pace and the algorithm in which the State will let the market place and other civil institutions voluntary to deal with these problems is a matter of practicing politics. It you first not the Allied relationship, how other groups which is pronounced or works for maintaining state extensions beyond protecting the autonomy of the person. For that, we look at least American politics and civic practice, the idea of use for the benefit of freedom space left of conservative moral vision, and that the idea to use for cultivating the virtue of freedom space created can be made easy to work together.
The particular situation of the Romanian principalities did as many of the historical Romanian personalities to be the conservative and liberal. And the idea of the merger or Alliance and association between federations of nourished political successes in post-Communist Romania, Christian democracy being the most recent example.
But American history is the one that has generated a situation paradigmatica: Americans can be while traditionalists and radical individualists as their tradition has an institutional nature based on attachment towards individual freedom (Grover Norquist). The coalition of fuzionist type "Leave us alone", do not ask for subsidies from the State, but also freedom.
The use of the coercitie of the State to impose on citizens a culture of democratization and radicalist momentum in foreign policy are reported rather neoconservatori. (Camil Ungureanu, Grover Norquist, Marcel Guarnizo). But these are warnings against sliding into practice in deviant moves from initial fuzionista platform (Camil Uba).
The disappearance of communism seems to deprive the Alliance between conservative and libertarian of the main catalyst-common enemy-leaving them to quarrel on the subject freely dezincriminarii consequences of drug use or the relationship between massive deregulation and fragmentation of society. If left to run, traditional forms of social aggregation can protect the individual from excesses of the State and provide reliable criteria for psychological maturation of the individual. They will support and inform choices and free interaction (Mihail Neamtu).
That is exactly the limit permissible by law of coercion? As long as the Conservatives did not give up the idea of promoting ethical or religious purposes through the State, cannot be a genuine reconciliation with libertarienii. However, the merger could take place at the edges of the root of currents. Some roots are found in the philosophy of Hayek's policy, which on the one hand attacking the idea of direction of the community and the human being in favor of individual decisions, but dispersed in the meantime quit and the strict technological discipline confirmed radical natural law theory in favor of an evolutionism of rules (Emanuel Sad).
Because the level of practical advertising a meeting place. It would be an error to believe that common opponent conservatives and libertarienilor disappeared. There are geographic fronts around traceable authoritarian regimes, the ideological fronts around traceable avatars radical leftist (Marcel Guarnizo, Gelu Trandafir) and hidden fronts the old structures from State institutions shortening and privileged positions in the political, business, media (Gelu Trandafir).
The ideological framework of radical type prevails at cultural level, just as the etatismul prevails at institutional level. Major strategic error that has led us here is disregarding the idea of limits of the reality structure resistant to human will and damage to the cultural component which made possible by Western civilization. Freedom politics, cultural freedom and economic freedom are so connected that specialized with legitimarile who were concerned about the libertarian economists seem not to be enough. Chance gets in the revival ability think tank to address issues of democracy integrative (Marcel Guarnizo).
This civic and intellectual capacity is in its early stages. But the assault on the individuals accustomed reality forces a particular sense of urgency. Americans are facing an unprecedented pressure etatista and the Romans floating adrift at such a distance from the shore that conservatives and libertarienii to be here for now to put aside their differences. Even if the two light "Lighthouse", conservative, libertarian and is different from such a distance the two beams of light to be confused (Cristian Caan).
Specifically, if the political Union of the intellectual currents that inspire contemporary right is to take place through the PD-L, then the PD-L have to acquire three lessons (Carley). First: fuzionismul should be accepted as a criterion and opinionated able to cleanse the party of complicitati plutocratice. Second: instead of having to wait for agreement or integrating intellectual movements such as conservatism, Christian democracy or libertarianismul of some others, professional politicians have to take acceptable strategies of federalisation. Once the release of uncertainties, we could devote their efforts to the project. Third: fuzionismul concerns freedom, deregulation and fiscal loosening.
But in the way of learning these lessons, and to successfully adopt expansive u.s., staying at least three setbacks (R Castillo). The first obstacle is at the level of political institutions: the formation of the intellectual platforms as the basis for political platforms is simpler in a federated system as political actors can mobilize without having to wait for permission from the Center. The political system of a unitary State with a hierarchically organized parties, where politicians are addicted opinionated and financial decisions of the Centre, is more rigid. The second you an absence of ideas: too few understand arguments relevant doctrines. Finally the third obstacle lies in the special challenge faced by a conservative mood in the post-Communist context. In this context, the Conservatory has separated traditional liberal vein at antiliberal; Here you will discover that the tradition of liberty is so fragile that it is more than building recovered. Then you need to understand why when the past is so perverted, conservative values may require a radical rupture or revolutionary.
We are confident that together with our collaborators and partners we will overcome these problems. Along with the discussion of several aspects of the common platform of libertarienilor and conservative project CADI and the Konrad Adenauer Foundation launches a question: is fuzionismul a good political issue for us nefireasca reglementativa tax burden and moral discomfort and material own current system?
