* Originally Published in revista 22 collection ' Fuzionismul: an experiment in doctrinaire of modern discourse '.
The basis of conservatism is a desire for less government interference or less centralized authority or more individual freedom and this is a pretty general description also of what libertarianism is. (Ronald Reagan)
It has been said that, with the disappearance of communism after the fall, after 20 years, the Berlin wall and after the collapse of the USSR, would be stopped and that there are common enemy threatened with the destruction of Western civilization, and justify the need for the Alliance between conservative and libertarian, as did Ronald Reagan.
Gone, really communism?
Comrades of the road on the left or West-European American, have not assumed any responsibility so far is complicitatii moral support of Communist regimes, whose crimes can no longer be denied or ignored today. On the contrary, in the context of the current economic crisis, the Government of interventionismul production of the left had the most substantial contribution, left Occidental indulge in the most extremes of reconsideration and the recovery of Marxism.
Russia and China, although faced with catastrophic results of planned economy, have their way, capitalism, they have not become democratical, have not ceased to manifest imperialist ambitions and hostility toward a Western model. Distant leadership groups in these countries, as well as in the former Soviet republics of Central Asia, are not subject to any control on the part of society, the State is omnipotent, citizens ' rights are violated, the opposition is repressed.
Eastern Europe, the Baltic States, and in lesser extent, Georgia and Ukraine, have managed to detach themselves from the former Soviet Empire, but now faces with its living heritage. The old structures of the Communist secret police have maintained their privileged positions in the political environment, business, mass media, as well as within State institutions, still insufficiently lustrate. These groups are the main generator of corruption and, at the same time, the route through which Russia can promote their interests and maintain influence in these countries.
Usually it's dropped out of sight and the situation in Latin America. In 1990, put the bases of the Sao Paolo Forum, planuia Fidel Castro to recover in Latin America what Marxism had lost in Eastern Europe; This continent is now red, under the control of the Forum, during which coordinated work in the spirit of leninist parties left, legal, governmental, and narco-terrorist organizations.
In Africa, the colonial empire after the collapse of the Soviet were maintained post-Marxist dictatorships which continued to impede the development of these countries.
The report "Undermining democracy", conducted last year by the free Europe and Freedom House, describes the danger to the democratic system of authoritarian regimes such as China, Russia, Venezuela, Iran and Pakistan. Thus, massive foreign aid granted without any exigency by the countries of this group of the civilized world efforts relating to tangible assets good governance and fighting corruption in countries that are dependent on external support. For example, China has become the largest creditor of Africa. The report highlights the "distortion" of democracy realized by means of large foreign investments made in the media by authoritarian regimes. Also, these regimes have managed largely to hijack the activities of international organizations such as UN, OSCE or the Organization of American States, creating at the same time, the parallel institutions which reinterprets the democracy, human rights, rewrite history and educate a new generation of Western civilization and democracy hostile.
Communism has not disappeared. He just changed, according to the same teachings of Lenin, "dialectic", State of aggregation, currently hiding under apparent more soft or hard anymore.
Communism is just a State of aggregation of the enemy of Western civilization-revolutionary movement, as it shows the philosopher Olavo de Carvalho, a brazilian. Revolutionary movement is a greater ideological family and older, manifested by historically in various forms, starting from the heresy of cathara, passing through the French Revolution, the Enlightenment, the Mexican Revolution, etc., culminating with the appearance of bolsevismului and Nazism. There are various "projects" that promise Heaven here on Earth, and follow the power, in the name of Utopia, whose realization would have to occur in the future, a prospect with everything conservative, both foreign and libertarienilor.
Revolutionary movement starts from an attitude of revolt against the present reality. As we know, the reality of this world we live in is imperfect, being affected by all the shortcomings of the human condition: land deprivation, injustice, conflicts, illnesses. Revolutionary mentality to judge and condemn without appeal this reality, they want to destroy, together with all its roots, traditions from the past.
Olavo de Carvalho consider revolutionary mentality as a phenomenon of nature, a collective psychotic delirium systematized, characterized by a series of reversals: this is not judged by the unchanging past experience, but through a project for the future. "The project", being generous, great and justify any means, allowing to reverse the traditional ratio between right and wrong, truth and falsehood, assassin and victim.
The problems of mankind, upholding ideologies of the revolution, will be resolved entirely earthly means, only to be put into practice the grand plan, the masses to be won for the cause, "educating" in the spirit of the respective ideology, and, necessarily, to be educated, starpiti, or silenced, real or imaginary enemies, "progress"-depending on the case, Jews, Christians, the bourgeoisie, reactionarii etc.
Brazilian philosopher considered as belonging to the revolutionary movement and different ideologies of contemporary Western left area, such as feminism, environmentalism, gay militancy issue, theology, etc. We know today that accurately these moves were heavily used, often even initiated and funded by the Soviet secret services, in the free world, to undermine it, and to reduce its defense capacity. These moves are related, by the way, with Marxism, but also with other ideologies that have in common the conflict opened with Judeo-Christian religious tradition: New Age type neopaganismul, atheist Richard Dawkins, Darwinism, malthusianismul, or the movement for a world government. All these moves, apparently independent to each other, even contradictory-under certain aspects, are, in fact, what they were most important: the target of their attacks, the Judeo-Christian Civilization.
* I chose to use in this article the term libertarian and not the Liberals to avoid confusions linked with different acceptiunile can be attributed to the second term. Understand the meaning of the definition of libertarianismul from The Concise Encyclopedia of Conservative Brad Miner: "the philosophy of limited government and individualism. The term indistinguishing has become useful to contemporary interpretation of classical liberalism from the[…] welfare liberalism ".
