* Originally Published in revista 22 collection ' Fuzionismul: an experiment in doctrinaire of modern discourse '.
"The seafarer for whom two lighthouses can mark the extreme point of danger relative to his present position knows that by going back and making a wholly different approach, the two lighthouses will fuse together to form a single object to the vision, confirming the safety of his position. They are then said to be «in range "(William f. Buckley Jr.)
A discussion about the success or failure of the fuzionismului-intellectual and political approach was born in America and in American circumstances and at whose export to European and Romanian lands cannot than hope seems today, in full obamista revolution, what they call "an exercise in futility."
In America it's not just the weather no matter how refined debates on the edge of the advantages and disadvantages of the Association of classical liberalism and adherents of numerous streams. Weather is "tea party," meaning the weather resistance against fundamental transformation project-based egalitarian, collectivist and statist, relativistic-unprecedented transformation of the whole of American society that launched a Barack Obama administration.
When the State spreads with such aggression, when the madness engulfed the over-borrowing of regulating all the breath of America and of the world, when the free market is under siege from political elite incapable to understand the simple truth that you cannot spend more than you produce, when individual freedom is besieged by "entitlement programs", "collective empowerment" and "community organizing", when the cultivation of difference and diversity is made on account of the fundamental liberties inscribed in the Constitution irreconcilable differences, of debating between libertarianism and conservatism is similar to discuss the sex of angels when the Turks are at the gates of the fortress.
Maybe libertarianul believes that individual freedom is the goal in itself validated by Reason, and the Conservatory as is merely a means in order to achieve some goals related to the cultivation of moral virtues that find their anchor in a firmer belief in God; but now they have both a greater urgency: to defend the freedom of the ship towards the rocks that lead a wind of a story which no longer regard these days neither Reason nor God or tradition.
Maybe you have different opinions, sometimes irreconcilable about the role of the State in terms of legalization of gay marriages, sex, the imperative of Marley-ian "legalize marijuana" or suicide, but definitely libertarienii and conservatives agree that a State which extends power over elections concerning the life and death of its citizens in the name of universal medical assistance guarantee is a threat to all.
You may not have the same opinion about the exact limits of free market capitalism and the benefits a company (post) industrial, but definitely will not easily accept any one nor the other as "General Motors" to be bailed out with public money only because it is "too big to fail". Maybe they'll finally agree that the project of financial reform in the Senate debate of inserts, then the words of Richard w. Rahn, ' Fascism ' in America.
Can discuss forever if the constitutional obligation of the federal State to cover and protect the citizens from Afghanistan and Iraq wars, if the order that accompanies a liberal Empire is preferable to a multi-polar founded solely on power relations; but I can at least agree that the threat of jihadista is very real since it produces dramatic effects in terms of freedom of expression and privacy control even on Earth.
And, of course, will agree that taxpayers stand best in their pockets, not the State, and that private initiative and entrepreneurship are the only individual who can play all the wealth.
For a contemporary browser on waters of politics, the difference between light and headlight headlamp conservative libertarianism is less important. This is because from the position in which the Navigator, the differences fade and the two tiny light coming from those two distant headlights blending in a RADIUS. It is not necessary nor desirable that they totally confuse because from a distance we should be able to read a single clear message: "attention, danger of tyranny!"
