* Originally Published in revista 22 collection ' Fuzionismul: an experiment in doctrinaire of modern discourse '.
There is a justified irritation towards policy analysis. Model batutului water into retail, of deliberate diversion and pervertirii nerusinate of reality is the most raspindit in the Romanian media. Analysis of politics founded in Romania by Brucan and Bacon and Diane popularizata and Canete. It's natural that most people of good faith to find political talks a waste of time.
Why is theory important?
Theory of politics is a catalyst for reality, it's able to speed up the clarification of doctrinal in moments of crisis. She remains a weak theory in the sense of the definition of scientific theory because the predictions are often contested, and ii to return be adjusted on the fly. Political doctrines, even the most perverse, but have no need for justification. Values, without reasons, are only words from the dictionary. That is why, far from being the product of some intellectuals, torn, barren of reality, the theory of true policy exactly nutritious soil in which they grow and intellectual movements and doctrines which have harbored political movements. Movements which governs how you can specifically and pragmatically. Therefore, theoretical pursuits in politics are not waste of time.
Fuzionismul it is important for the Romanian right precisely because it offers a model in which intellectual, theoretical approach, is also able to change the political and economic reality. Such doctrinal or ideological alliances that give trouble political scientists are primarily tools of intervention upon reality, platforms, more than theoretical constructs.
Three lessons for PDL fuzioniste
First: Fuzionismul is a defense reaction. Kristol, fuzionistul Parafrazind's "a libertarian besieged fiction" outside morals freedom political fiction. These alliances of political discourse are born not of speculation but of the need to respond to a common threats. The new security officers and Communists reciclati in successful business people are builders of this life-threatening fictiuni of freedom without moral and a redoubtable enemy, as you explain to Gaba. If Basescu correctly identified the enemy, PDL has too many complicitati of which we must escape.
Second: Fuzionismul is a paradox. Theoretical merger, in fact, it's impossible. Libertarienii and Conservatives will not be able to merge, as notice Camil Ungureanu. Alliance historical scale e circumstantiala. Can be extremely solid but at the level of different election cycles. Individualization of political currents is more important than their forced merger that may not lead to an unreliable explosion. It's not the question for LIBERALS who absorbs but how do we separate the current internal political and pragmatic alliances. Christian-democratic movement formed around Theodor Baconschi and Emil Boc seems to prove that at least part of the PDL has understood well the risks of forced unity.
Third: Libertarianismul and conservatism are about freedom: Grover Norquist talks about conservatives and libertarienii who "want to be left alone". Freedom is a concept far too general right-wing political movements need to "translate" and it clarified that he regain the unifying meaning. An Alliance or group of right-wing Alliance that promises "the State which leave us in peace" will be relevant to a broad electoral spectrum. That's why LIBERALS should look to 2012 that is able to govern in this direction, to reform Romania towards the State which leaves us more alone. And the movements and alliances right currents inside the PDL will have to translate the concept of freedom in a common objective and practical, familiar simpatizantului of right turn.
