Igual: my specialization is the local administration here is a higher degree of transparency. Can I put in work efficiency monitoring tools. I am ready to participate in the formation of a coalition of civil security system reform if we structure the process around the verifiable indicators of intersubjective. But now we don't have anything like this at your disposal regarding the work of the intelligence services. What are the costs for example, officer? Cahill officers were excluded from service as a result of irregularities or abuses? Without such key performance indicators and indicators of integrity, we remain only to monitor laws and how they are not put into practice. There is indeed a desire on the part of the Monitoring Committee of the Parliament, but it is rather a complaints Office of SRI that conveys his wishes and troubles.
Robins: we are afraid of a hazard about which we have a vague image, as in 1984. For example it's not precise enough legislation to allow Services to make significant acquisitions, netransparentem and law 298/2008 starts from the premise that individuals are potential terrorists.
Nageswara Rao: it is not the first time form a coalition for reform of civil security. In 2006 the Academy of Advocacy, Timisoara, ProDemocratia Association, the society of Professional Journalists have organized a programme of public hearings. The process must be continued but what are the chances? What actually happened from then until now?
Sceptismului panderi: Expression and suspicion are the elements of a liberal atmosphere. But it is necessary for the functioning of democracy and a measure of trust in the institutions as well. We cannot get away from the premise that all the actors are irationali.
Sorin Cucerai: If we have statistics on how many transactions are taking place how many phones have been answered and what results were found, then we could we could discuss, on the basis of the rate of success how are these measures necessary. Why for instance undercover officers are needed in the political and academic space? And assuming you are, we need guarantees that the service provides security in relation to themselves. For that it would take place may regandim services in the constitutional architecture. In the United Kingdom for example Services under a double-checking, and governmental and parliamentarian.
Iulian Fota: the european context and the context of the broader institutional framework in which we find ourselves, help our goals of safety and freedom. For example the European Parliament already monitors the area services and introduce a new element of democratic control type.
George Maior: role of SRI is to defend freedom and security. It is normal that the secret nature of the service to arouse suspicions. The same secret nature restricts communication and publishing. The issue has gained emotional intensity still unjustified. No I would not say that we are in a stalemate. The reform began earlier and has evolved in two dimensions: the moral, (here the most notable step was transferring the dossiers effort towards the CNSAS) and quality of service. The average age of employees in the service is for 35 years. Control of legality of SRI is done in several ways, through a Parliamentary Commission reports, then by the Director appointed by the Parliament at the SRI proposal of. There are also monthly reports to the Control. And control Essentials is the Court's mandate given to each operation. Legislation, dating from 1992, is outdated and should be changed only on the adaptation to the new kind of global danger of terrorism linked to the military facilities of the roman territory and migrationist flow. Law 298 not only provoke the civil society, but also the degree of Service through bureaucratization. Should not be forgotten, however, that the current legal framework has good parts. For example allow neutrality policy services although there are obviously pressures.
Ungureanu: we can't make education about how we should be detention. Employees of these institutions and they are contributors to the State, and they are interested in the optimization of the State; and the laws under which we work are less equivocal with both employees and are more comfortable. Parliament is entitled to require information about the legal activity of SRI and SIE. And since the class policy is an important legal beneficiaries of such information, the responsibility of the legal beneficiaries is equally important as the responsibility of the actionala service.
Constantin Dudu Ionescu: organizational culture of SRI and SIE is as closed as ever. Law 51/91 was unconstitutional.
Vlad Tait: when I'm asked trust a State institution whose activity it's secret, I wonder "on what basis should I trust Star?". The State is an enemy of citizens on par with any other enemy of humanity. Nor is it clear why there must be institutions as well as the secret service. And if there are, and their work is transparent, how could I trust that do not reach the hands of the most?
Oakley Jora: from the perspective of economic concern with such a suspicion. If free exchange reflects consumer needs-buyers, I wonder whose need a serve. I for one do not feel like I have this need. I have an observation with regard to the inspection activity services that you structure incentives: once you put them in your arms and consfintesc certain privileges of some to watch others is very hard to limit the activity of the rudimentary means then. I see a contradiction between law 52/2003 which requires transparency of governance and law 298/2008.
